Skip to content

Sync upstream v1.29.2#302

Merged
rishabh-11 merged 1056 commits intogardener:machine-controller-manager-providerfrom
sssash18:sync-upstream-v1.29.0
May 21, 2024
Merged

Sync upstream v1.29.2#302
rishabh-11 merged 1056 commits intogardener:machine-controller-manager-providerfrom
sssash18:sync-upstream-v1.29.0

Conversation

@sssash18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sssash18 sssash18 commented Apr 24, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:
Sync with upstream autoscaler v1.29.2

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #275

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

- Synced changes till v1.29.2 of upstream autoscaler.
- Updated the log level of some pod scheduling logs for better debugging.

dlipovetsky and others added 30 commits October 9, 2023 08:10
If the 'get' and 'list' verbs are present, but the 'watch' verb is
absent, the autoscaler reports an error. For example:

cluster-autoscaler-b8949d8b9-76vcd E1006 22:11:43.056176       1
reflector.go:148]
k8s.io/client-go/dynamic/dynamicinformer/informer.go:108: Failed to
watch infrastructure.cluster.x-k8s.io/v1beta2,
Resource=vcdmachinetemplates: unknown
clusterapi: Add 'watch' verb to scale-from-zero example
autoscaler: fix premature end of binpacking
…vertical-pod-autoscaler/builder/golang-1.21.2

Bump golang from 1.21.1 to 1.21.2 in /vertical-pod-autoscaler/builder
feat(tencentcloud): remove dependency on tke interface
Updated the owners of externalgrpc cloudprovider
…lity

Convert scale-down checks to drainability rules
Update ec2_instance_types with make generate
- HasNodeGroupStartedScaleUp checks wheter a scale up request exists
  without checking any upcoming nodes.
Add HasNodeGroupStartedScaleUp to cluster state registry.
jbartosik et al are transitioning off of workload autoscalers (incl vpa
and addon-resizer). kwiesmueller is on the new team and has agreed to
take on reviewer/approver responsibilities.
…-fix

Add information about provisioning-class-name annotation.
Fix multiple run of informers created in fetcher.go
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 10, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 10, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 10, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels May 10, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 10, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@aaronfern aaronfern left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the changes!
/lgtm

/second-opinion @rishabh-11

@gardener-robot gardener-robot removed needs/changes Needs (more) changes needs/review Needs review needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels May 10, 2024
@aaronfern aaronfern added the needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else label May 10, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 14, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 removed the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 14, 2024
@ghost ghost added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels May 14, 2024
@ghost ghost added reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels May 21, 2024
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/second-opinion Needs second review by someone else labels May 21, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-2 gardener-robot-ci-2 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label May 21, 2024
@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 changed the title Sync upstream v1.29.0 Sync upstream v1.29.2 May 21, 2024
@rishabh-11 rishabh-11 merged commit 73b5bfe into gardener:machine-controller-manager-provider May 21, 2024
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Sync with Upstream v1.29.0