Skip to content

feat(ACI): Make ProjectRuleDetailsEndpoint DELETE method backwards compatible#109752

Merged
ceorourke merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ceorourke/ISWF-2135
Mar 3, 2026
Merged

feat(ACI): Make ProjectRuleDetailsEndpoint DELETE method backwards compatible#109752
ceorourke merged 2 commits intomasterfrom
ceorourke/ISWF-2135

Conversation

@ceorourke
Copy link
Member

If we are directly passed a Workflow we need to delete it rather than expecting a dual written Rule.

@ceorourke ceorourke requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2026 00:13
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Mar 3, 2026

- Actions - specify what should happen when the trigger conditions are met and the filters match.
"""
if features.has("organizations:workflow-engine-rule-serializers", project.organization):
if isinstance(rule, Workflow):
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is just a nicety change unrelated to the delete method

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Mar 3, 2026
@ceorourke ceorourke requested a review from a team March 3, 2026 00:22
@ceorourke ceorourke merged commit 907fd1c into master Mar 3, 2026
77 checks passed
@ceorourke ceorourke deleted the ceorourke/ISWF-2135 branch March 3, 2026 18:11
ceorourke added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2026
Try to look up the related `Rule` object and delete that as well if we
are passed a workflow to the issue alert rule delete method. In
#109752 I assumed we'd always be
getting a single written workflow but that may not always be the case.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants