Overview
Period: 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-15
Runs analyzed: 25 (24 had token data; 1 cancelled before any tokens were consumed)
Total tokens: 5,119K raw (1,679K effective after Anthropic cache pricing)
Estimated total cost: $5.99
Total Actions minutes: 108 min
Total turns: 139
Total errors: 9 across 25 runs
Two Claude-engine workflows ran: Security Guard (12 runs) and Smoke Claude (13 runs). Both use claude-sonnet-4-6 with very high prompt cache efficiency (≥99.99%). Security Guard had the higher per-run cost and the most reliability issues (3 cancelled runs, 5 total errors).
Workflow Summary
| Workflow |
Runs |
Total Tokens |
Avg Tokens/Run |
Total Cost |
Avg Cost/Run |
Total Turns |
| Security Guard |
12 |
2,121K |
177K |
$3.23 |
$0.27 |
53 |
| Smoke Claude |
13 |
2,998K |
231K |
$2.76 |
$0.21 |
86 |
| Total |
25 |
5,119K |
205K |
$5.99 |
$0.24 |
139 |
🔍 Optimization Opportunities
-
Security Guard — 3 cancelled runs + 5 total errors (41.7% of runs with errors or cancellations)
- Run #2172 cancelled with 3 errors and zero token usage
- Runs #2163 and #2161 also cancelled
- Error rate exceeds the 30% threshold — investigate reliability root cause
-
Security Guard — Lower cache read:write ratio (2.8:1) vs Smoke Claude (5.0:1)
- Security Guard: 1,521K cache reads / 553K cache writes
- Smoke Claude: 2,492K cache reads / 495K cache writes
- Security Guard cache is being written more per reuse cycle — consider whether context windows are being reused across turns optimally
-
Smoke Claude — 2 failures out of 13 runs (15% failure rate)
- Runs #2484 and #2497 both failed with 1 error each
- Below the 30% threshold, but worth monitoring for regression
Per-Workflow Details
Security Guard
- Runs: 12 (#2157 #2159 #2160 #2161 #2162 #2163 #2164 #2166 #2171 #2172 #2173 #2174)
- Total tokens: 2,121K raw (avg 177K/run)
- Estimated cost: $3.23 (avg $0.27/run)
- Turns: 53 total (avg 4.4/run)
- Model:
claude-sonnet-4-6 (Anthropic)
- Cache analysis: 1,521K cache reads / 553K cache writes → 2.8:1 read:write ratio; cache efficiency ≥99.99% on instrumented runs
- Error rate: 5 errors across 5 runs (3 cancelled, 2 failed) — ⚠️ >30% threshold exceeded
| Run # |
Conclusion |
Tokens |
Cost |
Turns |
Errors |
| #2157 |
✅ success |
149K |
$0.28 |
4 |
0 |
| #2159 |
✅ success |
248K |
$0.44 |
6 |
0 |
| #2160 |
✅ success |
245K |
$0.41 |
6 |
0 |
| #2161 |
❌ cancelled |
137K |
$0.24 |
4 |
0 |
| #2162 |
✅ success |
231K |
$0.37 |
4 |
0 |
| #2163 |
❌ cancelled |
130K |
$0.14 |
4 |
2 |
| #2164 |
✅ success |
130K |
$0.14 |
4 |
0 |
| #2166 |
✅ success |
218K |
$0.29 |
5 |
0 |
| #2171 |
✅ success |
200K |
$0.30 |
4 |
0 |
| #2172 |
❌ cancelled |
0 |
$0.00 |
0 |
3 |
| #2173 |
✅ success |
142K |
$0.27 |
4 |
0 |
| #2174 |
✅ success |
291K |
$0.35 |
8 |
0 |
Smoke Claude
- Runs: 13 (#2484 #2487 #2489 #2490 #2491 #2492 #2493 #2494 #2496 #2497 #2502 #2504 #2505)
- Total tokens: 2,998K raw (avg 231K/run)
- Estimated cost: $2.76 (avg $0.21/run)
- Turns: 86 total (avg 6.6/run)
- Model:
claude-sonnet-4-6 (Anthropic)
- Cache analysis: 2,492K cache reads / 495K cache writes → 5.0:1 read:write ratio; cache efficiency 100% on all instrumented runs
- Error rate: 4 errors across 4 runs (1 cancelled, 2 failures) — 30.8%, slightly above threshold
| Run # |
Conclusion |
Tokens |
Cost |
Turns |
Errors |
| #2484 |
❌ failure |
229K |
$0.24 |
7 |
1 |
| #2487 |
✅ success |
230K |
$0.24 |
6 |
0 |
| #2489 |
✅ success |
181K |
$0.22 |
6 |
0 |
| #2490 |
✅ success |
227K |
$0.24 |
7 |
0 |
| #2491 |
✅ success |
227K |
$0.24 |
6 |
0 |
| #2492 |
✅ success |
273K |
$0.16 |
7 |
0 |
| #2493 |
❌ cancelled |
182K |
$0.13 |
6 |
2 |
| #2494 |
✅ success |
227K |
$0.14 |
6 |
0 |
| #2496 |
✅ success |
271K |
$0.16 |
7 |
0 |
| #2497 |
❌ failure |
182K |
$0.24 |
7 |
1 |
| #2502 |
✅ success |
227K |
$0.24 |
7 |
0 |
| #2504 |
✅ success |
271K |
$0.26 |
7 |
0 |
| #2505 |
✅ success |
272K |
$0.25 |
7 |
0 |
Runs Without Token Data
1 run had no token data (cancelled before any API calls):
- Security Guard run #2172 —
cancelled, 3 errors, 0 tokens
Historical Trend
| Period |
Workflows |
Runs |
Total Cost |
Avg Cost/Run |
Total Tokens |
| Apr 14–15 (this report) |
Security Guard, Smoke Claude |
25 |
$5.99 |
$0.24 |
5,119K |
| Apr 5–13 (prev report) |
Secret Digger, Security Guard, Smoke Claude |
23 |
$6.81 |
$0.30 |
4,305K |
Notable changes vs previous report:
- ✅ Avg cost/run dropped $0.30 → $0.24 (−20%) — likely because high-cost Secret Digger Claude workflow is absent from this period
- ⚠️ Security Guard gained 4 more runs; error/cancellation rate increased
- ➕ New: raw token volume increased (+19%) even without Secret Digger, driven by more Smoke Claude runs
Previous Report
§1967 — 📊 Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-13
References:
Generated by Daily Claude Token Usage Analyzer · ● 540.2K · ◷
Overview
Period: 2026-04-14 to 2026-04-15
Runs analyzed: 25 (24 had token data; 1 cancelled before any tokens were consumed)
Total tokens: 5,119K raw (1,679K effective after Anthropic cache pricing)
Estimated total cost: $5.99
Total Actions minutes: 108 min
Total turns: 139
Total errors: 9 across 25 runs
Two Claude-engine workflows ran: Security Guard (12 runs) and Smoke Claude (13 runs). Both use
claude-sonnet-4-6with very high prompt cache efficiency (≥99.99%). Security Guard had the higher per-run cost and the most reliability issues (3 cancelled runs, 5 total errors).Workflow Summary
🔍 Optimization Opportunities
Security Guard — 3 cancelled runs + 5 total errors (41.7% of runs with errors or cancellations)
Security Guard — Lower cache read:write ratio (2.8:1) vs Smoke Claude (5.0:1)
Smoke Claude — 2 failures out of 13 runs (15% failure rate)
Per-Workflow Details
Security Guard
claude-sonnet-4-6(Anthropic)Smoke Claude
claude-sonnet-4-6(Anthropic)Runs Without Token Data
1 run had no token data (cancelled before any API calls):
cancelled, 3 errors, 0 tokensHistorical Trend
Notable changes vs previous report:
Previous Report
§1967 — 📊 Claude Token Usage Report 2026-04-13
References: