This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 9, 2020. It is now read-only.
internal/gps: parallelize WriteDepTree#1021
Merged
sdboyer merged 1 commit intogolang:masterfrom Aug 17, 2017
Merged
Conversation
This commit updates WriteDepTree to parallelize write projects to the vendor directory. Signed-off-by: Ibrahim AshShohail <ibra.sho@gmail.com>
1fa8a51 to
87bf819
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Running I tried |
jmank88
approved these changes
Aug 16, 2017
sdboyer
approved these changes
Aug 17, 2017
Member
|
wow, that's way more of an improvement than i'd expected. spectacular! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this do / why do we need it?
This commit updates WriteDepTree to parallelize write projects to the
vendor directory.
This change gives a decent speed boost when writing
vendordirectory.What should your reviewer look out for in this PR?
Correctness.
Which issue(s) does this PR fix?
This somehow became part of #952 even though it's not really related. 😁