Skip to content

remove reference to non-existent Google Analytics partial#1949

Closed
dmah42 wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:mainfrom
dmah42:patch-1
Closed

remove reference to non-existent Google Analytics partial#1949
dmah42 wants to merge 1 commit intogoogle:mainfrom
dmah42:patch-1

Conversation

@dmah42
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@dmah42 dmah42 commented Apr 26, 2024

it looks like the non-gtag Google Analytics partial was removed (makes sense, given the GA migration to gtag) but the head partial is still trying to reference it.

this causes build errors (https://discourse.gohugo.io/t/error-error-building-site/49340).

@chamiz
Copy link
Copy Markdown

chamiz commented May 1, 2024

I hope Docsy maintainers team will make a release soon. With Hugo version .0125.0+ we are facing issue with Google Analytics page

@chalin chalin added the duplicate This issue or pull request already exists label May 1, 2024
@chalin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

chalin commented May 1, 2024

Thanks @dmah42 but this has already be resolved:

@chalin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

chalin commented May 1, 2024

I hope Docsy maintainers team will make a release soon. With Hugo version .0125.0+ we are facing issue with Google Analytics page

@chamiz - yes, a release should be out within the next week or so. In the meantime there are several interim solutions you can try. Let me start a discussion thread about this.

@chalin chalin closed this May 1, 2024
@chalin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

chalin commented May 1, 2024

@chamiz, see:

@chamiz
Copy link
Copy Markdown

chamiz commented May 1, 2024

Thanks @chalin. I did changes in the local. However, this is for Selenium documentation where we use automated build.
For now, I downgraded Hugo to v0.124.1.

@chalin chalin added this to the 24Q2 milestone Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants