Skip to content

P34: implementing field type is either exact match or of covariant type#974

Merged
leebyron merged 2 commits intographql:mainfrom
rivantsov:P34_IntfImplTypeMatch
Jan 5, 2023
Merged

P34: implementing field type is either exact match or of covariant type#974
leebyron merged 2 commits intographql:mainfrom
rivantsov:P34_IntfImplTypeMatch

Conversation

@rivantsov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fix: exact type match is not required for implementing field; might be of covariant type

@netlify
Copy link
Copy Markdown

netlify bot commented Jul 28, 2022

Deploy Preview for graphql-spec-draft ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a6df980
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/graphql-spec-draft/deploys/63b723f273602f0009f005b0
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-974--graphql-spec-draft.netlify.app/draft
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mjmahone mjmahone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah this is correct, and just a re-iteration of what we say on object type validation: https://spec.graphql.org/draft/#IsValidImplementation()

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants