Skip to content

renaming of assertion fields #509

@ahwagner

Description

@ahwagner

We had a discussion during the documentation sprint today about the use of the terms summary (e.g. variant summary, gene summary) and statement (e.g. evidence statement) in CIViC. Assertions currently have a summary with an associated description, but we discussed that labeling the summary field as a statement is more aligned with the principle of assertions and the intent of the field.

We also discussed how the description field is typically the aggregated details of how the summary (statement) was generated, and thus may benefit from a field label of details.

@kkrysiak @obigriffith @malachig @ebarnell and @arpaddanos, your input here would be helpful as we strive to align the terms we use across these concepts.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions