chore: RecordCreationSuite rework assertions

[derektriley]

Description:
This pull request refactors the RecordCreationSuite tests to simplify and improve the validation of transfer lists in transaction records. It removes balance snapshot assertions and replaces them with direct checks on the contents of the TransferList within transaction records. Additionally, it increases the retry limit for transaction record queries to improve test reliability.

Test refactoring and simplification:

• Removed balance snapshot and account balance assertion steps from test cases in RecordCreationSuite, reducing test flakiness and focusing validation on transaction record contents.
• Replaced previous balance assertions with direct validation of TransferList contents using including and includingDeduction matchers, ensuring that the correct fee splits and deductions are present in the transaction record.

Test reliability improvement:

• Increased the retry limit for transaction record queries in HapiGetTxnRecord from 200 to 300, allowing up to 3 seconds for record retrieval and improving test stability.

Imports and cleanup:

• Removed unused imports and obsolete constants, and added necessary imports for new assertion logic in RecordCreationSuite.

Related issue(s):

Fixes #23165

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[lfdt-bot]

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status	Scanner	Critical	High	Medium	Low	Total (0)
✅	Open Source Security	0	0	0	0	0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
✅ +0.00% (target: -1.00%)	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (071b4bd)	94447	75410	79.84%
Head commit (4d837ba)	94447 (+0)	75410 (+0)	79.84% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#23168)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #23168   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     75.91%   75.91%           
  Complexity    23589    23589           
=========================================
  Files          2556     2556           
  Lines         94632    94632           
  Branches      10093    10093           
=========================================
  Hits          71836    71836           
  Misses        19122    19122           
  Partials       3674     3674           

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[petreze]

It seems it failed in PR check, just saw that