feat: cu profiling section update

[C0mberry]

Description

• adding instruction and program name to cu profiling tooltip
• adding total/requested cu units to heading

Type of change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Protocol integration
• Documentation update
• Other (please describe):

Screenshots

Testing

http://localhost:3000/tx/3RXTbQBXfHjNvSuBPbJx3BK3CUZrxzQXoiRiDojLwhHV72y1Xg885K2rt6cgKrECMZkNzT42SqH1fmHLUXWAp6FX?cluster=devnet

Checklist

• My code follows the project's style guidelines
• I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
• All tests pass locally and in CI
• I have updated documentation as needed
• CI/CD checks pass
• I have included screenshots for protocol screens (if applicable)
• For security-related features, I have included links to related information

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Review	Updated (UTC)
explorer	Ready	Preview, Comment	Jan 14, 2026 2:48pm

[rogaldh]

Please don't forget to paste a link to the sample instruction

[rogaldh]

Could you, please, check that Compute Budget Program's tooltip contains instruction name as well?
http://localhost:3000/tx/26kPcgGdACHqW5E9fBbKv3P2pzCHyFd1amtioAvkdRZkHauRC8DBvncSCwjxkwrsgZrMWXf4SQ2tPmUBgYwee52n

[rogaldh]

Please check this link http://localhost:3000/tx/u3swuUP5Za9Hqf2i4HK9M7CcQw98YqtjrMjub2zjvh9u7cN65PoPKcAvPfdyZnY8PDof4sZvBfK34qVBrtSDjGq/inspect
Looks like we need to check that bars are visible

[rogaldh]

http://localhost:3000/tx/4Vyh3doiNqM41VxBpvzhzD6Aq9hELt6xq6xwK13snBScPtHeqMTi2WvPDvV2yesWyt2DaMtbG2b1udhh35NMxbrq/inspect

Could you, please, check this transaction. It contains instructions for ComputeBudget and ATA programs. Let's do this:

• add instruction names for these programs
• build the code in a way to add names for instructions for other programs in future
• • We should definitely have a small comment in the code with explanations to support other program instructions.

I've discovered there are names for instructions on the transaction page, but not on the transaction inspector page. Instruction name resolving should work for both

[rogaldh]

Last nits:

• http://localhost:3000/tx/2JWEaaB8zMpS4V4EuAG8vnnQnjErrz9FNrbPBsJ5WcVASFKvzwDaq69Kx4NcgL178GUSbmbdaDMMZ68A3jFJtSAq/inspect?cluster=devnet > does not have isntruction names for: SystemProgram and Token-2022 program

• http://localhost:3000/tx/239eVbvzGfnvuTfniNy6Ryowz8RpPP64qH9grTupABrBSBiobhmqZqzZcdA8UXQwsEvE3JcJu2etz9Fv1VCaEduq/inspect?cluster=devnet > does not have name for instruction

• http://localhost:3000/tx/628p6yywy5ztQbXBwuP8tUethXABoNdt77mKoxuaVfwe7xrDufXmmWePDGUHPVNzPGFoohQbepn5eMjXjP9n9y89/inspect?cluster=devnet > have instruction names partially avaialble

• http://localhost:3000/tx/3kAvMC23QmMn8TtQq9FkKjGdUsbpEdowWJ7APwLmQ8Cp57hZMFv3GdC3QUH3F1dg3XiwfPwS5V5QrLghVQzS4KTp/inspect?cluster=devnet > has logs, but the name is unavailable

I have hypothesis that this is because of simulation errors on the inspector page. But if this is true, why does we have names partially as on the screen, link:

[rogaldh]

Overall structure looks good. It will help us in the future to parse the names for other programs. Maybe we can make an attempt to parse instructions for inspector the same way we do for cards. But that will be critical change imo.
Thanks.

[C0mberry]

for better experience, complete https://linear.app/solana-fndn/issue/HOO-252/refactor-into-parsed-datats-file

[rogaldh]

Overall structure looks good. It will help us in the future to parse the names for other programs. Maybe we can make an attempt to parse instructions for inspector the same way we do for cards. But that will be critical change imo. Thanks.

I think let's cover parsing later. Could you please make a quick check that all works, and let's create a PR to the upstream

[rogaldh]

LGTM