Extended border radius on relevant widgets#1869
Merged
hecrj merged 3 commits intoiced-rs:masterfrom May 23, 2023
Merged
Conversation
dd004cf to
6d7bafc
Compare
6d7bafc to
1c86def
Compare
hecrj
requested changes
May 23, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR exposes the internal
BorderRadius([f32; 4])and replaces it with the current type (f32).This means we now have the possibility to create buttons, containers and so on with different border radii.
Breaking changes
This is a breaking change, however to migrate to this new BorderRadius we have the following
implSo in most cases a simple
.into()will solve it.