Fix guards against repeated external sets of SPI implementations#690
Merged
manovotn merged 1 commit intojakartaee:masterfrom Aug 30, 2023
Merged
Conversation
We previously [1] added code to guard against repeated calls to these SPIs: - `BuildServicesResolver.setBuildServices()` - `CDI.setCDIProvider()` The guards are unfortunately incorrect. This commit fixes them. [1] jakartaee@82ec5d7
Member
Author
|
Fortunately, the code that we previously added did not make it into any release, it's only in the |
Contributor
Good catch! 👍 |
manovotn
approved these changes
Aug 30, 2023
Contributor
manovotn
left a comment
manovotn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for noticing this!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We previously [1] added code to guard against repeated calls to these SPIs:
BuildServicesResolver.setBuildServices()CDI.setCDIProvider()The guards are unfortunately incorrect. This commit fixes them.
[1] 82ec5d7