Enhancement: Review and improve flag descriptions, examples, and CLI help for better UX

[camilamacedo86]

Audit and improve CLI help across commands to ensure a clear, consistent, and user-friendly experience.

Goals

• Make flag descriptions accurate, concise, and consistent.
• Provide better examples that cover common workflows and edge cases.
• Improve help layout/content so users can quickly understand what to do next.

Scope

• Review help output for root command and key subcommands (e.g. init, create, edit, alpha/*).
• Standardize wording for shared flags (--plugins, --project-version, etc.).
• Ensure examples are relevant per command and do not mention unsupported combinations.
• Prefer actionable guidance (what it does, when to use it, minimal example).
• Verify if has flags that should be marked as deprecated either since has no longer usage

Acceptance criteria

• All flags have clear descriptions (no ambiguity, no outdated wording).
• Each major command has at least 2–3 high-value examples.
• Help output avoids noisy/technical errors and reads well in terminals.
• Consistent formatting across commands (headings, examples, tables).

[ashishkpathak-connect]

/assign

[cmallikarjunah]

/assign

I would like to help out here too.

[cmallikarjunah]

Hi @camilamacedo86,
I have made some modifications to CLI Help of two of the major commands - init, edit in the PR #5498.
Changes include the following:

1. Added following files to init cmd description:
   Dockerfile
   test/
   hack/
2. Moved all flag descriptions to func BindFlags() for each of the command.
3. For --repo flag for init cmd, added "auto-detected if not provided and project is initialized within $GOPATH"
4. Put additional info into NOTES section.

Please let me know if these changes align with the expectations of this issue specifically would like to know if you find (2) efficient (have provided the reasons to keep it this way in the draft PR), if not kindly advice me on this further..

Meanwhile I'll proceed working on other commands.