Add --node-instance-group flag to ginkgo#16065
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
upodroid
force-pushed
the
add-node-instance-group
branch
from
3e804d4 to
1bee68a
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/L
|
/cc @justinsb as we discussed in the office hours earlier today |
|
@upodroid: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: discussed, the, office, as, we, in, hours, earlier, today. Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
upodroid
force-pushed
the
add-node-instance-group
branch
from
1bee68a to
ecf212d
Compare
|
/test pull-kops-kubernetes-e2e-cos-gce-serial |
|
@upodroid: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hakman The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
3 participants
This should fix these failing tests:
https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-cluster-lifecycle-kubeup-to-kops#ci-kubernetes-e2e-cos-gce-disruptive-canary&include-filter-by-regex=gcp
The tests with cloud-provider-gcp tag are missing the e2eskipper