-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 674
fix qp_leak bug after PR#384 #1643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The pull request aims to fix a QP leak by setting the endpoint status to inactive when it is deleted. This ensures that the endpoint can be reclaimed once all outstanding transfers are complete. However, the fix is only applied to the
deleteEndpointmethod and is missing from theFIFOEndpointStore::evictEndpointmethod. When an endpoint is evicted from the FIFO store because it has reached its maximum size, it is moved to thewaiting_list_but itsactive_status remainstrue. As a result,RdmaEndPoint::hasOutstandingSlice()will always returntrue, andFIFOEndpointStore::reclaimEndpoint()will never remove the endpoint from thewaiting_list_. This leads to a leak of RDMA Queue Pairs (QPs) and other resources, which can eventually lead to a Denial of Service (DoS) when the system runs out of available QPs.Note that
SIEVEEndpointStore::evictEndpointcorrectly callsset_active(false)on line 212, soFIFOEndpointStoreshould be updated to match this behavior.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall LGTM. But what do authors think about this issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The behaviors of SIEVEEndpointStore and FIFOEndpointStore do indeed need to match, but the purpose of this PR is to fix the qp leakage issue introduced in PR#384. PR#384 did not modify the evictEndpoint function, and I cannot predict what impact it would have.