fix: progress ring initialization exception #1356#1357
Merged
pomianowski merged 1 commit intolepoco:mainfrom Feb 21, 2025
Merged
fix: progress ring initialization exception #1356#1357pomianowski merged 1 commit intolepoco:mainfrom
pomianowski merged 1 commit intolepoco:mainfrom
Conversation
github-actions
bot
added
controls
chucker
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
pomianowski
approved these changes
Feb 21, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes the initialization issue with the ProgressRing control
Pull request type
Please check the type of change your PR introduces:
What is the current behavior?
Trying to use the ProgressRing throws an exception at runtime: "Metadata override and base metadata must be of the same type or derived type"
Issue Number: 1356
What is the new behavior?
The progress ring works as expected.
Other information
The issue was in the static constructor for the Arc control.