Add pipeline (comfyui or streamdiffusion) to the ai_current_live_pipe…

[leszko]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 3.22581% with 30 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 31.93001%. Comparing base (3a69e43) to head (53adca6).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
monitor/census.go	4.34783%	22 Missing ⚠️
server/ai_mediaserver.go	0.00000%	6 Missing ⚠️
server/ai_live_video.go	0.00000%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #3686         +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage   31.94339%   31.93001%   -0.01338%     
===================================================
  Files            156         156                 
  Lines          47412       47435         +23     
===================================================
+ Hits           15145       15146          +1     
- Misses         31374       31396         +22     
  Partials         893         893                 

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
core/livepeernode.go	60.22099% <ø> (ø)
server/ai_live_video.go	0.00000% <0.00000%> (ø)
server/ai_mediaserver.go	4.41315% <0.00000%> (-0.00830%)	⬇️
monitor/census.go	61.49635% <4.34783%> (-0.73409%)	⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3a69e43...53adca6. Read the comment docs.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
core/livepeernode.go	60.22099% <ø> (ø)
server/ai_live_video.go	0.00000% <0.00000%> (ø)
server/ai_mediaserver.go	4.41315% <0.00000%> (-0.00830%)	⬇️
monitor/census.go	61.49635% <4.34783%> (-0.73409%)	⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mjh1]

Can't we just loop through the keys of countByPipeline rather than hard coding?

[leszko]

Yes, we could, but then I guess we would not zero the metric, because it would just not distinguish the empty map entry and no key. Or do you think it could work?

[leszko]

@mjh1 I think I found a way to make it working for any pipeline. Please take a look:
cb113d5