Weekly sync — 2026-03-03

[github-actions]

Attendees

tag the contrubutors that must attend

Agenda

What are the topics to be discussed?

• Josh, NaaP project management to guide what we're building, and somewhat more importantly, what we're not building.
• Mehrdad, What channels to use for for communication? What information is public and what should be discussed privately?

Next Steps

What are the key follow up actions

[github-actions]

Before the meeting

@mehrdadmms @j0sh @eliteprox @seanhanca @mikezupper @0xspeedybird @rickstaa

Reply before the meeting with:

1. One Word Check-in - On Track / At risk / Missing Deadline
2. Progress — What you did last week. Keep it short, and outcome focused. Bulletpoint format. (Max 150 words)
3. Discussion — What you want air time for. Add questions, blockers, discussion points with the person it is directed to.

No agenda = no air time.

Example

Check in

At risk

Progress

• We shipped the BYOC plugin this week.
• Made 23% progress towards our milestone and we're on track

Discussion

• Qiang, what is the definition of a plugin?
• Mike, we are at risk because the issue#191 is a blocker for us.
• All, can we change the architecture for BYOC plugin?

---

Agenda & notes: meeting-notes/

[eliteprox]

On Track

• NaaP Overview dashboard integration with Epic 1 deliverable naap#63
• feat(developer-api): List models available on the network naap#146

At Risk

• prototype the architecture of SDK as a service in NaaP naap#172

Progress
Last week

• Implemented metrics in NaaP Overview dashboard NaaP Overview dashboard integration with Epic 1 deliverable naap#63
  • Feature was not released last week due to lack of real job data. Pricing info also needs to be added to metrics data store (Cloud SPE leaderboard changes needed)
  • In progress: Add on-chain fee data to Overview dashboard
• Initial review on Livepeer branding and UX naap#173
• Assisted with

This week

• Discussion with Cloud SPE (Monday) to identify metrics and data collection gaps for NaaP
• Reviewed Livepeer branding and UX naap#173 and merged 🚀
• Reviews on @seanhanca's Service Gateway plugin prototype the architecture of SDK as a service in NaaP naap#172

Discussion points

• Which "connectors" or "templates" should be MVP for the NaaP Service Gateway plugin?
• Should we prioritize third-party service integrations like for OpenAI. Shouldn't we promote Livepeer? With days to weeks of runway, these integrations feel low value
• Can we spike a fully functional gateway using the SDK in NaaP as a shell plugin first?
• Clarity needed on secrets/key storage in NaaP.
• After successful shell plugin MVP, validate a robust PaaS deployment option for NaaP users building their own apps.
  • imo the "goal" for Plugin Marketplace (for now) should be various gateway templates, built on the core python SDK package
• BYOC changes (can we prioritize after service gateway and metrics are complete?):
  • go-livepeer: feat(remote_signer): Add job token signing endpoint for byoc job types go-livepeer#3869
  • SDK: j0sh/livepeer-python-gateway@main...eliteprox:livepeer-python-gateway:feat/byoc-payments