release/22.x: [lldb] Iterate over a copy of the ModuleList in SearchFilter (#189009)#190277
Merged
c-rhodes merged 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom Apr 6, 2026
Merged
release/22.x: [lldb] Iterate over a copy of the ModuleList in SearchFilter (#189009)#190277c-rhodes merged 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom
c-rhodes merged 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom
Conversation
Member
Author
|
@igorkudrin What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
Member
Author
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: llvmbot ChangesBackport ce1b12e Requested by: @JDevlieghere Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190277.diff 3 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp b/lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp
index 6cd00af64870a..e14beba1fe40c 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Core/SearchFilter.cpp
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ bool SearchFilter::CompUnitPasses(FileSpec &fileSpec) { return true; }
bool SearchFilter::CompUnitPasses(CompileUnit &compUnit) { return true; }
bool SearchFilter::FunctionPasses(Function &function) {
- // This is a slightly cheesy job, but since we don't have finer grained
+ // This is a slightly cheesy job, but since we don't have finer grained
// filters yet, just checking that the start address passes is probably
// good enough for the base class behavior.
Address addr = function.GetAddress();
@@ -262,7 +262,9 @@ SearchFilter::DoModuleIteration(const SymbolContext &context,
return Searcher::eCallbackReturnContinue;
}
- for (ModuleSP module_sp : m_target_sp->GetImages().Modules()) {
+ ModuleList module_list = m_target_sp->GetImages();
+ // Since we're iterating over a copy, no need to do any locking.
+ for (ModuleSP module_sp : module_list.ModulesNoLocking()) {
// If this is the last level supplied, then call the callback directly,
// otherwise descend.
if (!ModulePasses(module_sp))
@@ -422,14 +424,9 @@ void SearchFilterByModule::Search(Searcher &searcher) {
searcher.SearchCallback(*this, empty_sc, nullptr);
}
- // If the module file spec is a full path, then we can just find the one
- // filespec that passes. Otherwise, we need to go through all modules and
- // find the ones that match the file name.
-
- const ModuleList &target_modules = m_target_sp->GetImages();
- std::lock_guard<std::recursive_mutex> guard(target_modules.GetMutex());
-
- for (ModuleSP module_sp : m_target_sp->GetImages().Modules()) {
+ ModuleList module_list = m_target_sp->GetImages();
+ // Since we're iterating over a copy, no need to do any locking.
+ for (ModuleSP module_sp : module_list.ModulesNoLocking()) {
if (FileSpec::Match(m_module_spec, module_sp->GetFileSpec())) {
SymbolContext matchingContext(m_target_sp, module_sp);
Searcher::CallbackReturn shouldContinue;
@@ -545,7 +542,9 @@ void SearchFilterByModuleList::Search(Searcher &searcher) {
// If the module file spec is a full path, then we can just find the one
// filespec that passes. Otherwise, we need to go through all modules and
// find the ones that match the file name.
- for (ModuleSP module_sp : m_target_sp->GetImages().Modules()) {
+ ModuleList module_list = m_target_sp->GetImages();
+ // Since we're iterating over a copy, no need to do any locking.
+ for (ModuleSP module_sp : module_list.ModulesNoLocking()) {
if (m_module_spec_list.FindFileIndex(0, module_sp->GetFileSpec(), false) ==
UINT32_MAX)
continue;
@@ -707,7 +706,7 @@ bool SearchFilterByModuleListAndCU::AddressPasses(Address &address) {
cu_spec = sym_ctx.comp_unit->GetPrimaryFile();
if (m_cu_spec_list.FindFileIndex(0, cu_spec, false) == UINT32_MAX)
return false; // Fails the file check
- return SearchFilterByModuleList::ModulePasses(sym_ctx.module_sp);
+ return SearchFilterByModuleList::ModulePasses(sym_ctx.module_sp);
}
bool SearchFilterByModuleListAndCU::CompUnitPasses(FileSpec &fileSpec) {
@@ -744,7 +743,9 @@ void SearchFilterByModuleListAndCU::Search(Searcher &searcher) {
ModuleList matching_modules;
bool no_modules_in_filter = m_module_spec_list.GetSize() == 0;
- for (ModuleSP module_sp : m_target_sp->GetImages().Modules()) {
+ ModuleList module_list = m_target_sp->GetImages();
+ // Since we're iterating over a copy, no need to do any locking.
+ for (ModuleSP module_sp : module_list.ModulesNoLocking()) {
if (!no_modules_in_filter &&
m_module_spec_list.FindFileIndex(0, module_sp->GetFileSpec(), false) ==
UINT32_MAX)
diff --git a/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/Inputs/main.c b/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/Inputs/main.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..78f2de106c92b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/Inputs/main.c
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+int main(void) { return 0; }
diff --git a/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/source-regex-missing-source.test b/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/source-regex-missing-source.test
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..5cb7863ee53ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lldb/test/Shell/Breakpoint/source-regex-missing-source.test
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# Test that setting a source regex breakpoint doesn't deadlock when the source
+# file has been deleted after compilation.
+
+# RUN: cp %p/Inputs/main.c %t.c
+# RUN: %clang_host -g -o %t %t.c
+# RUN: rm %t.c
+# RUN: %lldb -b -o "br set -p any" %t 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+
+# CHECK: Breakpoint 1: no locations (pending).
+# CHECK-NOT: error
+# CHECK-NOT: assert
|
igorkudrin
approved these changes
Apr 3, 2026
…9009) Avoid a potential deadlock caused by the search filter callback acquiring the target's module lock by iterating over a copy of the list. Fixes llvm#188766 (cherry picked from commit ce1b12e)
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport ce1b12e
Requested by: @JDevlieghere