release/22.x: [clang] Fix issues with const/pure on varargs function. (#190252)#190405
Open
llvmbot wants to merge 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom
Open
release/22.x: [clang] Fix issues with const/pure on varargs function. (#190252)#190405llvmbot wants to merge 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom
llvmbot wants to merge 1 commit intollvm:release/22.xfrom
Conversation
There are two related issues here. On the declaration/definition side, we need to make sure the markings are conservative. Then on the caller side, we need to make sure we don't access parameters that don't exist. Fixes llvm#187535. (cherry picked from commit 9471fab)
Member
Author
|
@arsenm What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
Member
Author
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: llvmbot ChangesBackport 9471fab Requested by: @efriedma-quic Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/190405.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp
index d7bdeb3981cf8..06203733a1263 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCall.cpp
@@ -3024,6 +3024,11 @@ void CodeGenModule::ConstructAttributeList(StringRef Name,
}
assert(ArgNo == FI.arg_size());
+ // We can't see all potential arguments in a varargs declaration; treat them
+ // as if they can access memory.
+ if (!AttrOnCallSite && FI.isVariadic())
+ AddPotentialArgAccess();
+
ArgNo = 0;
if (AddedPotentialArgAccess && MemAttrForPtrArgs) {
llvm::FunctionType *FunctionType = getTypes().GetFunctionType(FI);
@@ -3035,7 +3040,14 @@ void CodeGenModule::ConstructAttributeList(StringRef Name,
unsigned FirstIRArg, NumIRArgs;
std::tie(FirstIRArg, NumIRArgs) = IRFunctionArgs.getIRArgs(ArgNo);
for (unsigned i = FirstIRArg; i < FirstIRArg + NumIRArgs; ++i) {
- if (FunctionType->getParamType(i)->isPointerTy()) {
+ // The index may be out-of-bounds if the callee is a varargs
+ // function.
+ //
+ // FIXME: We can compute the types of varargs arguments without going
+ // through the function type, but the relevant code isn't exposed
+ // in a way that can be called from here.
+ if (i < FunctionType->getNumParams() &&
+ FunctionType->getParamType(i)->isPointerTy()) {
ArgAttrs[i] =
ArgAttrs[i].addAttribute(getLLVMContext(), *MemAttrForPtrArgs);
}
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/struct-passing.c b/clang/test/CodeGen/struct-passing.c
index ba96798dc51ef..b50ee351947d4 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/struct-passing.c
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/struct-passing.c
@@ -18,18 +18,47 @@ int __attribute__((pure)) f5(T1 a);
T1 __attribute__((const)) f6(void*, int);
T1 __attribute__((pure)) f7(void*, int);
-void *ps[] = { f0, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7 };
+T1 __attribute__((const)) f8(int, ...);
+int __attribute__((const)) f9(int, ...);
+
+void *ps[] = { f0, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8, f9 };
+
+// Check markings for varargs arguments.
+//
+// FIXME: We can add markings in more cases.
+void test(T1 t1, void *p) {
+ f8(1);
+ f8(1, t1);
+ f8(1, p);
+
+ f9(1);
+ f9(1, t1);
+ f9(1, p);
+}
// CHECK: declare i32 @f0() [[RN:#[0-9]+]]
// CHECK: declare i32 @f1() [[RO:#[0-9]+]]
// CHECK: declare void @f2(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RNRW:#[0-9]+]]
// CHECK: declare void @f3(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RORW:#[0-9]+]]
-// CHECK: declare i32 @f4(ptr {{[^,]*}} byval({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RNRW:#[0-9]+]]
-// CHECK: declare i32 @f5(ptr {{[^,]*}} byval({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RORW:#[0-9]+]]
-// CHECK: declare void @f6(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4, ptr {{[^,]*}} readnone, i32 {{[^,]*}}) [[RNRW:#[0-9]+]]
-// CHECK: declare void @f7(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4, ptr {{[^,]*}} readonly, i32 {{[^,]*}}) [[RORW:#[0-9]+]]
+// CHECK: declare i32 @f4(ptr {{[^,]*}} byval({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RNRW]]
+// CHECK: declare i32 @f5(ptr {{[^,]*}} byval({{[^)]*}}) align 4) [[RORW]]
+// CHECK: declare void @f6(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4, ptr {{[^,]*}} readnone, i32 {{[^,]*}}) [[RNRW]]
+// CHECK: declare void @f7(ptr {{[^,]*}} sret({{[^)]*}}) align 4, ptr {{[^,]*}} readonly, i32 {{[^,]*}}) [[RORW]]
+// CHECK: declare void @f8(ptr dead_on_unwind writable sret(%struct.T1) align 4, i32 noundef, ...) [[RNRW]]
+// CHECK: declare i32 @f9(i32 noundef, ...) [[RNRW]]
+
+
+// CHECK: call void (ptr, i32, ...) @f8(ptr dead_on_unwind writable sret(%struct.T1) align 4 {{.*}}, i32 noundef 1) [[RNRW_CALL:#[0-9]+]]
+// CHECK: call void (ptr, i32, ...) @f8(ptr dead_on_unwind writable sret(%struct.T1) align 4 {{.*}}, i32 noundef 1, ptr noundef byval(%struct.T1) align 4 {{.*}}) [[RNRW_CALL]]
+// CHECK: call void (ptr, i32, ...) @f8(ptr dead_on_unwind writable sret(%struct.T1) align 4 {{.*}}, i32 noundef 1, ptr noundef %0) [[RNRW_CALL]]
+// CHECK: call i32 (i32, ...) @f9(i32 noundef 1) [[RN_CALL:#[0-9]+]]
+// CHECK: call i32 (i32, ...) @f9(i32 noundef 1, ptr noundef byval(%struct.T1) align 4 {{.*}}) [[RNRW_CALL]]
+// CHECK: call i32 (i32, ...) @f9(i32 noundef 1, ptr noundef %1) [[RN_CALL]]
+
// CHECK: attributes [[RN]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(none){{.*}} }
// CHECK: attributes [[RO]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(read){{.*}} }
// CHECK: attributes [[RNRW]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite){{.*}} }
// CHECK: attributes [[RORW]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(read, argmem: readwrite){{.*}} }
+// CHECK: attributes [[RNRW_CALL]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(argmem: readwrite) }
+// CHECK: attributes [[RN_CALL]] = { nounwind willreturn memory(none) }
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 9471fab
Requested by: @efriedma-quic