docs: mention scan results audit trail in README#408
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @marcusquinn, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request focuses solely on documentation, enhancing the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
🔍 Code Quality Report�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status: �[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity: 📈 Current Quality Metrics
Generated on: Fri Feb 6 23:53:39 UTC 2026 Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring |
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| The `--force` flag only controls file overwrite behavior (replacing an existing skill without prompting). To bypass security blocking, use `--skip-security` explicitly -- this separation ensures that routine updates and re-imports never silently skip security checks. | ||
|
|
||
| Scan results are logged to [`.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md`](.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md) automatically on each batch scan and skill import, providing a transparent audit trail of security posture over time. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The link to .agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md will be broken when viewed on GitHub, as this file is generated locally in the user's environment and is not part of the repository. To maintain consistency with how other local paths are referenced in this document and to avoid confusion from a broken link, it's better to format the path as code without making it a hyperlink.
| Scan results are logged to [`.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md`](.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md) automatically on each batch scan and skill import, providing a transparent audit trail of security posture over time. | |
| Scan results are logged to `.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.md` automatically on each batch scan and skill import, providing a transparent audit trail of security posture over time. |
|
1 participant
Summary
.agents/SKILL-SCAN-RESULTS.mdaudit trail file (added in feat: add skill scan results audit trail #406)Docs-only change, no code modifications.