GH#3569: fix(docs): add input/output label to opus cost pricing format

[alex-solovyev]

Summary

• Applies the gemini-code-assist inline suggestion from PR GH#3569: fix(docs): clarify opus cost multiplier with explicit pricing basis #4391 (merged)
• Adds input/output: label to the pricing format for clarity: (input/output: $5/$25 vs $3/$15 per 1M tokens)
• Removes ambiguity about which number is input vs output cost

Changes

File: .agents/tools/ai-assistants/models/opus.md

- Cost is approximately 1.7x sonnet ($5/$25 vs $3/$15 per 1M tokens) -- justify the spend
+ Cost is approximately 1.7x sonnet (input/output: $5/$25 vs $3/$15 per 1M tokens) -- justify the spend

Context

PR #4391 was merged with the pricing inline but without the input/output: label. The bot reviewer correctly noted that the $input/$output convention, while common, benefits from an explicit label. This follow-up applies that suggestion.

Closes #3569

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Review skipped — only excluded labels are configured. (1)

• no-review

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 25e0c311-349e-402c-833a-c88634375ef1

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch bugfix/3569-opus-cost-label

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

🔍 Code Quality Report

�[0;35m[MONITOR]�[0m Code Review Monitoring Report

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Latest Quality Status:
SonarCloud: 0 bugs, 0 vulnerabilities, 413 code smells

�[0;34m[INFO]�[0m Recent monitoring activity:
Fri Mar 13 07:57:49 UTC 2026: Code review monitoring started
Fri Mar 13 07:57:50 UTC 2026: SonarCloud - Bugs: 0, Vulnerabilities: 0, Code Smells: 413

📈 Current Quality Metrics

• BUGS: 0
• CODE SMELLS: 413
• VULNERABILITIES: 0

Generated on: Fri Mar 13 07:57:52 UTC 2026

---

Generated by AI DevOps Framework Code Review Monitoring

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud