Skip to content

Relax the positions in QHA workflow#158

Merged
shyuep merged 1 commit intomaterialyzeai:mainfrom
Andrew-S-Rosen:relaxfix
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

Relax the positions in QHA workflow#158
shyuep merged 1 commit intomaterialyzeai:mainfrom
Andrew-S-Rosen:relaxfix

Conversation

@Andrew-S-Rosen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Andrew-S-Rosen Andrew-S-Rosen commented Mar 6, 2026

To the best of my understanding, the QHACalc is not currently relaxing the atomic positions (at fixed cell volume) for each scaled structure, which would be a problem. I have fixed that. Closes #157.

@shyuep shyuep merged commit 9eb6c7f into materialyzeai:main Mar 6, 2026
1 of 3 checks passed
@shyuep
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

shyuep commented Mar 6, 2026

Thanks!

@Andrew-S-Rosen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@shyuep, please also review to make sure I have not made a logical error here.

@Andrew-S-Rosen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

No problem!

(I think this is the right way to go but could use a sanity check.)

Andrew-S-Rosen added a commit to Andrew-S-Rosen/matcalc that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
This is a follow-up to materialyzeai#158 to ensure that the `fmax` and `optimizer` are consistent between the different relaxations in the `QHACalc`.

Signed-off-by: Andrew S. Rosen <asrosen93@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: Are there fixed-cell relaxation steps missing from QHACalc?

2 participants