Conversation
This is forbidden by spec. See https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-5/#attr-security
`css.types.frequency` was already removed, so this doesn't make sense to retain.
Contributor
|
Tip: Review these changes grouped by change (recommended for most PRs), or grouped by feature (for large PRs). |
caugner
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This a stopgap for fixing false status calculations for
attr()support in web-features, ahead of completing the work in #26624. Specifically, this:css.types.attr.type-or-unitto descendants (Chrome 133)css.types.attr.type-or-unit.urlandcss.types.attr.type-or-unit.frequencyTest results and supporting details
Test cases (by me): https://codepen.io/ddbeck/pen/emJwRgg
css.types.attr.type-or-unit.urlis forbidden by specification:The
<frequency>type was removed as unimplemented in Remove<frequency>and<frequency-percentage>CSS types #24969. It doesn't make sense to retain data about a type that, functionally, does not exist.Related issues
css.types.attrwith CSS Values 5 extensions #26624