Address reviewer feedback on container network mode test

[Copilot]

Summary of the Pull Request

No changes required. The original reviewer comment incorrectly identified the test at line 1495 as checking for the wrong network mode. The test creates a container with WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_HOST (line 1486) and correctly asserts the network label is '[\"host\"]' (line 1495).

PR Checklist

• Closes: N/A - No code changes needed
• Communication: I've discussed this with core contributors already. If work hasn't been agreed, this work might be rejected
• Tests: Added/updated if needed and all pass
• Localization: All end user facing strings can be localized
• Dev docs: Added/updated if needed
• Documentation updated: If checked, please file a pull request on our docs repo and link it here: #xxx

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

The ContainerNetwork test method contains two separate test cases:

1. Lines 1480-1508: Tests WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_HOST mode

   • Creates container with WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_HOST (line 1486)
   • Verifies network label is '[\"host\"]' (line 1495) ✓ Correct

2. Lines 1510-1538: Tests WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_NONE mode

   • Creates container with WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_NONE (line 1517)
   • Verifies network label is '[\"none\"]' (line 1526) ✓ Correct

The reviewer's comment referenced incorrect line numbers and misidentified which test case was being evaluated. Both test cases are correct as implemented.

Validation Steps Performed

Verified code correctness by reviewing the test implementation and confirming network mode enum values match expected assertion values.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.