Suggestion: Rename "Source" to something like "ImageSource" or "TextureSource"

[gkjohnson]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It's not really clear what "Source" is for from the name.

Describe the solution you'd like

I think the class definition could be renamed to be more clear. Considering it's only for texture and image data I would imagine one of the following names might be more clear:

• ImageSource
• ImageDataSource
• TextureSource

Describe alternatives you've considered

😢

Additional context

--

[Mugen87]

I remember we've agreed to use a short name for simplicity and flexibility (see #17949 (comment)). Something like ImageSource and TextureSource are more descriptive but on the other hand the project's policy was to pick a simple/short alternatives in the past . More descriptive names tend to make the code longer and not necessarily easier to read.

Regarding this policy, I think would prefer to keep the current name.

[gkjohnson]

It sounds like there was a little back and forth - I think it's possible to have short and descriptive names. Source on it's own sounds very ambiguous. It could be an audio source, for example. I was just confused at what it could be when importing it so I made this suggestion. I was looking for something that had "Image" or "Texture" in the name