Skip to content

fix(registry): bump telegram channel version for capabilities change#1064

Merged
zmanian merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
fix/telegram-version-bump
Mar 13, 2026
Merged

fix(registry): bump telegram channel version for capabilities change#1064
zmanian merged 1 commit into
stagingfrom
fix/telegram-version-bump

Conversation

@zmanian
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@zmanian zmanian commented Mar 12, 2026

Summary

Test plan

Generated with Claude Code

The validation_endpoint addition to telegram.capabilities.json requires
a version bump to pass the CI version-check gate on staging promotion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the size: XS < 10 changed lines (excluding docs) label Mar 12, 2026
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the version of the Telegram channel within its registry configuration. This essential change ensures compatibility with new capabilities and resolves a critical CI failure that was blocking a significant staging promotion, allowing for smoother deployment processes.

Highlights

  • Telegram Channel Version Update: The Telegram channel version was incremented from 0.2.2 to 0.2.3 to align with the recent addition of a validation_endpoint in telegram.capabilities.json.
  • Unblocking Staging Promotion: This version bump resolves a version-check CI gate failure, which was preventing staging promotion PR chore: promote staging to main (2026-03-12 11:12 UTC) #1032 from proceeding.
Changelog
  • registry/channels/telegram.json
    • Updated the version field from 0.2.2 to 0.2.3.
    • Modified the url for the wasm32-wasip2 artifact to reflect the new 0.2.3 version.
Activity
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added risk: low Changes to docs, tests, or low-risk modules contributor: core 20+ merged PRs labels Mar 12, 2026
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request bumps the version of the Telegram channel in the registry. However, there is a critical issue: the sha256 hash for the artifact has not been updated to match the new version, which will break downloads. Additionally, there's a version mismatch between this registry file and the capabilities file in the source tree, which could cause confusion.

Comment on lines +21 to 22
"url": "https://github.com/nearai/ironclaw/releases/latest/download/telegram-0.2.3-wasm32-wasip2.tar.gz",
"sha256": "b9a83d5a2d1285ce0ec116b354336a1f245f893291ccb01dffbcaccf89d72aed"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The artifact URL has been updated to point to version 0.2.3, but the sha256 hash on the next line has not been updated. This will cause integrity checks to fail when downloading the new artifact. Please update the sha256 hash to match the new telegram-0.2.3-wasm32-wasip2.tar.gz artifact.

"display_name": "Telegram Channel",
"kind": "channel",
"version": "0.2.2",
"version": "0.2.3",
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The channel version is being bumped to 0.2.3, but the corresponding capabilities file at channels-src/telegram/telegram.capabilities.json still shows version 0.2.2. To maintain consistency, it's recommended to also update the version in the capabilities file. This helps avoid confusion about which version of the capabilities corresponds to this registry entry.

@zmanian zmanian enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2026 18:16
@G7CNF
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

G7CNF commented Mar 12, 2026

CI context: this PR only changes \ (data/version metadata), and all style/clippy/deny checks are passing. The only failure is , which is expected for a registry JSON-only bump.\n\nCould a maintainer please add the \ label (or apply \ in commit message) to unblock merge?

@G7CNF
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

G7CNF commented Mar 12, 2026

CI context: this PR only changes registry/channels/telegram.json (registry data/version metadata), and style/clippy/deny checks are passing.

The only failing check is Regression test enforcement, which is expected for this JSON-only bump.

Could a maintainer please add the skip-regression-check label (or include [skip-regression-check] in commit message) to unblock merge?

@zmanian zmanian added the skip-regression-check Bypass regression test CI gate (tests exist but not in tests/ dir) label Mar 12, 2026
@zmanian zmanian closed this Mar 12, 2026
auto-merge was automatically disabled March 12, 2026 21:53

Pull request was closed

@zmanian zmanian reopened this Mar 12, 2026
@zmanian zmanian enabled auto-merge (squash) March 12, 2026 21:54
@zmanian zmanian merged commit a89cf37 into staging Mar 13, 2026
20 of 22 checks passed
@zmanian zmanian deleted the fix/telegram-version-bump branch March 13, 2026 04:02
@ironclaw-ci ironclaw-ci Bot mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2026
ilblackdragon pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2026
…1064)

The validation_endpoint addition to telegram.capabilities.json requires
a version bump to pass the CI version-check gate on staging promotion.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bkutasi pushed a commit to bkutasi/ironclaw that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2026
…earai#1064)

The validation_endpoint addition to telegram.capabilities.json requires
a version bump to pass the CI version-check gate on staging promotion.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
drchirag1991 pushed a commit to drchirag1991/ironclaw that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2026
…earai#1064)

The validation_endpoint addition to telegram.capabilities.json requires
a version bump to pass the CI version-check gate on staging promotion.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

contributor: core 20+ merged PRs risk: low Changes to docs, tests, or low-risk modules size: XS < 10 changed lines (excluding docs) skip-regression-check Bypass regression test CI gate (tests exist but not in tests/ dir)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants