Conversation
|
@Eomm please chime in |
I was thinking the same, but I must say that the Talking off-topic, in my reasoning, the final goal would be to have utilities to build the
For sure we must keep these utilities as plain as possible to avoid becoming an ORM 😆 As a final thought, maybe these utilities could become:
In both cases, I think we are helping the developer.
I think that if these uses cases show up as issues, they can be covered. For sure we need to define a reasonable set of "it just works" thinks. |
7db994e to
11866b8
Compare
|
As discussed with @simoneb, moving the function to an example in the readme so that users can implement locally if desired. |
Close #93
This is a tested and working solution, however, I think before merging it would be good to discuss: