chore: relax types-requests version constraint

[petertriho]

Resolves dependency conflicts between types-requests and boto3/moto on Python 3.9 for #331

This PR

• Changes the types-requests dev dependency for both flipt and ofrep providers from types-requests>=2.32.0,<3.0.0 to types-requests>=2.31.0,<3.0.0

Related Issues

Fixes uv sync issues in #331

Notes

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @petertriho, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses uv synchronization issues by adjusting the version constraint for the types-requests development dependency across multiple OpenFeature providers. This change ensures compatibility and resolves build problems, particularly for a related pull request, by allowing a broader range of the types-requests package.

Highlights

• Dependency Constraint Relaxation: The types-requests development dependency has been relaxed for both the openfeature-provider-flipt and openfeature-provider-ofrep providers, changing the version constraint from >=2.32.0,<3.0.0 to >=2.31.0,<3.0.0.
• Version Bumps: The versions of openfeature-provider-flipt, openfeature-provider-ofrep, and openfeature-provider-unleash have been incremented in their respective pyproject.toml files and the uv.lock file.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request correctly relaxes the version constraint for the types-requests development dependency in the flipt and ofrep providers, and bumps their respective versions. The changes are sound, but the changelogs for the updated providers have not been updated to reflect these new versions. I've added comments to address this.

[gemini-code-assist]

The package version has been bumped to 0.1.4, but the corresponding entry is missing in providers/openfeature-provider-flipt/CHANGELOG.md. Please add a changelog entry for this new version to keep the project's release history up to date.

[petertriho]

It looks like the changelogs are generated automatically, not required?

[federicobond]

Correct. No need to bump this manually.

[petertriho]

Thanks, I removed the version bumps

[federicobond]

Could you add a one-line comment with a brief explanation—just enough for the next person to understand that there’s a deliberate reason this constraint is written this way?

[petertriho]

done, I also made it only affect python 3.9 sorry for the flip flopping. I changed it back to this (instead of splitting it between <3.10 and >=3.10 because I realise it just overcomplicating things and also would break existing installs on 3.9)

[federicobond]

Does this only happen on Python 3.9?

[petertriho]

Does this only happen on Python 3.9?

Yes. I could change the deps to if that's preferred?

"types-requests>=2.31.0,<3.0.0; python_version<'3.10'",
"types-requests>=2.32.0,<3.0.0; python_version>='3.10'",

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.52%. Comparing base (b9c164a) to head (24d14f7).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #334   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.52%   95.52%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1252     1252           
=======================================
  Hits         1196     1196           
  Misses         56       56           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[gruebel]

@petertriho the DCO is failing, probably you forgot to sign off your commit

[petertriho]

@gruebel thanks, forgot about that

[toddbaert]

@federicobond do you have any further concerns or can I merge this?