Add support for matched_fields with the unified highlighter#18166
Conversation
|
❌ Gradle check result for e9a0a85: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
e9a0a85 to
ad13011
Compare
|
❌ Gradle check result for ad13011: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
ad13011 to
6f75191
Compare
a6fbda7 to
fa503d1
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #18166 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 72.57% 72.47% -0.11%
+ Complexity 67446 67325 -121
============================================
Files 5488 5488
Lines 311069 311067 -2
Branches 45217 45218 +1
============================================
- Hits 225757 225431 -326
- Misses 66986 67229 +243
- Partials 18326 18407 +81 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
...rnalClusterTest/java/org/opensearch/search/fetch/subphase/highlight/HighlighterSearchIT.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
is the code coverage check being green mandatory? The code is being tested in integration tests but if you prefer I can introduce a dedicated test for these lines (might need to make some methods visible for testing, unless there are some facilities to easily create/mock |
fa503d1 to
4d6a2ae
Compare
|
❌ Gradle check result for 4d6a2ae: FAILURE Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
4d6a2ae to
09717f8
Compare
|
❕ Gradle check result for 09717f8: UNSTABLE Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure. |
09717f8 to
95d48bb
Compare
|
❌ Gradle check result for 95d48bb: null Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change? |
This option was silently ignored when running the unified highlighter. Since lucene 10 it is now possible to pass a list of additional fields to fetch matches from and blend into the snippets. Signed-off-by: David Causse <dcausse@wikimedia.org>
95d48bb to
dcd711a
Compare
…ch-project#18166) This option was silently ignored when running the unified highlighter. Since lucene 10 it is now possible to pass a list of additional fields to fetch matches from and blend into the snippets. Signed-off-by: David Causse <dcausse@wikimedia.org>
…ch-project#18166) This option was silently ignored when running the unified highlighter. Since lucene 10 it is now possible to pass a list of additional fields to fetch matches from and blend into the snippets. Signed-off-by: David Causse <dcausse@wikimedia.org>Signed-off-by: TJ Neuenfeldt <tjneu@amazon.com>
…ch-project#18166) This option was silently ignored when running the unified highlighter. Since lucene 10 it is now possible to pass a list of additional fields to fetch matches from and blend into the snippets. Signed-off-by: David Causse <dcausse@wikimedia.org>
Description
This option was silently ignored when running the unified highlighter. Since lucene 10 it is now possible to pass a list of additional fields to fetch matches from and blend into the snippets.
Related Issues
Resolves #18164
Check List
[ ] API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.