Skip to content

Restructure the search section#11894

Open
kolchfa-aws wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
search-relevance
Open

Restructure the search section#11894
kolchfa-aws wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
search-relevance

Conversation

@kolchfa-aws
Copy link
Collaborator

Restructure the search section

Checklist

  • By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license and subject to the Developers Certificate of Origin.
    For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com>
@github-actions
Copy link

Thank you for submitting your PR. The PR states are In progress (or Draft) -> Tech review -> Doc review -> Editorial review -> Merged.

Before you submit your PR for doc review, make sure the content is technically accurate. If you need help finding a tech reviewer, tag a maintainer.

When you're ready for doc review, tag the assignee of this PR. The doc reviewer may push edits to the PR directly or leave comments and editorial suggestions for you to address (let us know in a comment if you have a preference). The doc reviewer will arrange for an editorial review.

@kolchfa-aws
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@epugh As discussed, here's the PR to restructure the search section. Could you review this PR?

@epugh
Copy link
Collaborator

epugh commented Feb 20, 2026

A couple of comments, and I don't know if they are relavant to this PR or not, but wanted to provde.

When I go to the Search page, the very top section is fine. The second seciton is about Query Langugages. Four of the Five query langagues have nothing to do with Search, they are specific for Dashboards. So it's a bit confusing why they are there. They should be in the Dashboards space of the docs maybe?

image

@epugh
Copy link
Collaborator

epugh commented Feb 20, 2026

I lvoe this process steps you added:
image

I'll think more about it, it might be worthy of a graphic at some point. When we add in tools like ART (agentic relevance tuning) they may show up in this.

Signed-off-by: Fanit Kolchina <kolchfa@amazon.com>
@kolchfa-aws
Copy link
Collaborator Author

When I go to the Search page, the very top section is fine. The second seciton is about Query Langugages. Four of the Five query langagues have nothing to do with Search, they are specific for Dashboards. So it's a bit confusing why they are there. They should be in the Dashboards space of the docs maybe?

@epugh I focused the table on backend languages and added a link to the Dashboards query language list (already present in /dashboards/index). Many people are confused about the query language options, so I think it's a good idea to cross-reference these.

@kolchfa-aws kolchfa-aws added Tech review PR: Tech review in progress Awaiting response labels Feb 24, 2026
@epugh
Copy link
Collaborator

epugh commented Feb 27, 2026

When I go to the Search page, the very top section is fine. The second seciton is about Query Langugages. Four of the Five query langagues have nothing to do with Search, they are specific for Dashboards. So it's a bit confusing why they are there. They should be in the Dashboards space of the docs maybe?

@epugh I focused the table on backend languages and added a link to the Dashboards query language list (already present in /dashboards/index). Many people are confused about the query language options, so I think it's a good idea to cross-reference these.

Yeah, looking at it, it's better. It's just taking up a lot of real estate!

Maybe I would like it if it said "retrieve your data":
image

Since with PPL and SQL you are not searching, at least not in the more traditional sense. You are retrieving data, and we have multiple languages to support it.

@epugh
Copy link
Collaborator

epugh commented Feb 27, 2026

In this document: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EspLVQa9d2qZB55rBouSGSPtqzdsQt_waaiG3aKfxzE/edit?slide=id.g6fdd1a86d3_0_0#slide=id.g6fdd1a86d3_0_0 I have a graphic of the relevancy optimization....

And a slightly out of date (now) diagram that is specific to OpenSearch... WOuld you want to modify the section Search Quality Workflow to poentially include this diagram with the appropriate updates?

image

Copy link
Collaborator

@epugh epugh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! I left one comment and one idea, but the rest of the restructure looks good. I angst over if the vector tutorials should at all link to Search Quality, but we don't yet have an awesome thing to point to that would make a strong case, and you do have the link form the reranking one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants