Skip to content

[AUTO] Increment version to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT#4036

Closed
opensearch-trigger-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT
Closed

[AUTO] Increment version to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT#4036
opensearch-trigger-bot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT

Conversation

@opensearch-trigger-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

  • Incremented version to 3.3.0-SNAPSHOT.

@Swiddis Swiddis added the maintenance Improves code quality, but not the product label Sep 8, 2025
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch from f793d9e to 5834e70 Compare September 9, 2025 00:10
@ahkcs ahkcs mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2025
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch 5 times, most recently from baf4529 to ad18594 Compare September 16, 2025 00:09
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch from ad18594 to 96561ee Compare September 17, 2025 20:29
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch 5 times, most recently from 494d605 to 33ab488 Compare September 24, 2025 00:09
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch 4 times, most recently from 2485069 to 5a8d41c Compare September 29, 2025 00:10
@LantaoJin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I fixed the failures in UT. But cannot figure out the root cause of integration failure:

java.net.ConnectException: Connect to http://127.0.0.1:44123/ [/127.0.0.1] failed: Connection refused

@penghuo

Signed-off-by: opensearch-ci-bot <opensearch-infra@amazon.com>
@opensearch-trigger-bot opensearch-trigger-bot bot force-pushed the create-pull-request/3.3.0-SNAPSHOT branch from c92b01b to ca8ca8a Compare September 30, 2025 00:11
@LantaoJin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The PR will force push repeatedly, so push commit not make sense here. Here is my finding:

  1. To fix the unit test, make following change
diff --git a/opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/data/type/OpenSearchDateType.java b/opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/data/type/OpenSearchDateType.java
index 5ffce655d..e2808a598 100644
--- a/opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/data/type/OpenSearchDateType.java
+++ b/opensearch/src/main/java/org/opensearch/sql/opensearch/data/type/OpenSearchDateType.java
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ public class OpenSearchDateType extends OpenSearchDataType {

   /** Numeric formats which support full datetime. */
   public static final List<FormatNames> SUPPORTED_NAMED_NUMERIC_FORMATS =
-      List.of(FormatNames.EPOCH_MILLIS, FormatNames.EPOCH_SECOND);
+      List.of(FormatNames.EPOCH_MILLIS, FormatNames.EPOCH_SECOND, FormatNames.EPOCH_MICROS);

   /** List of named formats which support full datetime. */
   public static final List<FormatNames> SUPPORTED_NAMED_DATETIME_FORMATS =
  1. GeoIpFunctionsIT failed with following message, seems caused by Block redirect in IP2Geo and move validation to transport action geospatial#782
org.opensearch.client.ResponseException: method [PUT], host [http://localhost:9200], URI [/_plugins/geospatial/ip2geo/datasource/dummycityindex], status line [HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request]
    {"error":"no handler found for uri [/_plugins/geospatial/ip2geo/datasource/dummycityindex] and method [PUT]"}
        at __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([39B6CB623C046612:442D78E45A2E777C]:0)
        at app//org.opensearch.client.RestClient.convertResponse(RestClient.java:501)
        at app//org.opensearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:384)
        at app//org.opensearch.client.RestClient.performRequest(RestClient.java:359)
        at app//org.opensearch.sql.ppl.GeoIpFunctionsIT.createDatasource(GeoIpFunctionsIT.java:146)
        at app//org.opensearch.sql.ppl.GeoIpFunctionsIT.init(GeoIpFunctionsIT.java:58)

@Swiddis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Swiddis commented Sep 30, 2025

#4417

@Swiddis Swiddis closed this Sep 30, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

maintenance Improves code quality, but not the product v3.3.0

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants