Skip to content

Conversation

@SonyLeo
Copy link
Contributor

@SonyLeo SonyLeo commented Mar 7, 2025

English | 简体中文

PR

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • Built its own designer, fully self-validated

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

Background and solution

What is the current behavior?

  1. 多选节点进行点击回退剩余一个元素时,框选效果异常
  2. 快捷键剪切失效

Issue Number: N/A

What is the new behavior?

  1. 多选节点进行点击回退时,剩余元素框选效果显示正常
  2. 修复 单节点和多节点 快捷键剪切 操作

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined multi-selection handling to create a more consistent and efficient experience.
    • Removed redundant checks and initialization routines to ensure multiple item selections are processed more directly and reliably.
    • Enhanced the cut operation to support multiple selected nodes, improving functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Walkthrough

This update simplifies the multi-selection logic across the canvas components. In the Vue container and related files, the conditional logic determining multi-selection has been removed in favor of a direct reference to the multiState. Functions and variables that were not used have been removed, and initialization logic in the multi-selection composable has been streamlined. The changes adjust the control flow in selection functions and update corresponding export declarations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/canvas/container/src/CanvasContainer.vue
packages/canvas/container/src/container.js
Simplified multi-selection state management by directly referencing multiState, removing conditional logic and unused functions/variables, and updating the selection control flow (e.g., using setMultiSelection and simplifying sync functions).
packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js Removed initialization constructs (initMultiState and initMultiSelect), and modified toggleMultiSelection to change its control flow by omitting explicit boolean return values.
packages/canvas/container/src/keyboard.js Updated handleClipboardCut to remove the schema parameter, allowing it to handle multiple selected nodes and clear selections after cutting.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant C as Container
    participant MS as useMultiSelect
    participant CC as CanvasContainer
    
    U->>C: Click node (trigger selectNode)
    C->>MS: Call setMultiSelection(selectState)
    MS-->>C: Update multiSelectedStates
    C->>CC: Update UI with multiState (direct reference)
    Note over C,CC: Multi-selection logic simplified
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • hexqi
  • chilingling
  • rhlin

Poem

I'm just a little bunny,
Hopping through the code with glee,
Multi-select now dances simply,
No more tangles in our spree,
With each change, my heart feels sunny,
Carrots and clean code, that's the key!
🥕🐇

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

 ERR_PNPM_OPTIONAL_DEPS_REQUIRE_PROD_DEPS  Optional dependencies cannot be installed without production dependencies


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5a960c and 70635d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (0 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (4)

92-95: Good addition of the body element protection

Adding this check prevents the body element from being added to multi-selection, which aligns with the PR's goal of fixing abnormal displays when clicking back on multiple selected nodes.

The early return pattern is clean and effective here.


99-99: Guard clause prevents empty selection state

This check prevents creating an empty selection state when removing the last selected element, which helps maintain consistent application state and improves the control flow.


102-107: Parent-child selection handling resolves the display issue

This implementation correctly addresses the PR goal by filtering out child nodes when a parent is selected, which prevents the abnormal display effect when clicking back.

The comment and implementation align with the explanation provided in the previous review where selecting both parent and child elements would cause visual duplication.


94-110:

Details

❓ Verification inconclusive

Verify multi-selection behavior in complex DOM structures

The changes look good, but since this handles complex parent-child relationships, it's worth testing scenarios like:

  1. Deep nesting (grandparent → parent → child)
  2. Siblings selection followed by parent selection
  3. Behavior when cutting nodes (mentioned in PR description as being fixed)

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any automated tests for these multi-selection scenarios

# Look for test files related to multi-selection
echo "Searching for test files related to multi-selection..."
fd -t f "test|spec" -e js -e vue | grep -i "multi\|select"

# Check for any test coverage of the toggleMultiSelection function
echo "Checking for tests of toggleMultiSelection function..."
rg -l "toggleMultiSelection" --type js --type vue

# See if there are any issues reported about multi-selection
echo "Looking for related issues or PRs..."
rg -l "multiple.*select|multi.*select" --type md 

Length of output: 510


Manual Verification Required for Multi-Selection Edge Cases

The code changes look good, but the automated search did not identify tests for multi-selection scenarios. Please ensure that the following cases are verified manually (or add appropriate tests):

  • Deep nesting: Verify behavior for nested structures (e.g., grandparent → parent → child).
  • Sibling selection followed by parent selection: Confirm that toggling multi-selection when switching from sibling nodes to a parent node behaves as expected.
  • Behavior when cutting nodes: Ensure that the updated functionality fixes the issues described in the PR regarding node cutting.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (1)

86-88: Simplified return for invalid selection state

You've changed from returning false to simply returning undefined when there's no valid selection state. While both values are falsy, make sure there aren't any explicit checks for === false in the codebase that might be affected by this change.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b9b9556 and 134082c.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/CanvasContainer.vue (3 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (1 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/container.js (5 hunks)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/keyboard.js (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/canvas/container/src/CanvasContainer.vue
  • packages/canvas/container/src/container.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: push-check
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/canvas/container/src/composables/useMultiSelect.js (3)

94-96: Good addition of guard clause for body element

Adding this early return prevents the body element from being part of multi-selection, which helps maintain a cleaner selection state.


98-100: Prevent empty selection

Good addition to prevent an empty selection list. This helps fix the abnormal display issue mentioned in the PR by maintaining at least one selected node.


102-108: Improved parent-child relationship handling

This new code properly filters out child nodes when a parent is selected, preventing parent and child nodes from being selected simultaneously. This is likely a key fix for the abnormal display issue when clicking back on multiple selected nodes.

packages/canvas/container/src/keyboard.js (2)

99-110: Enhanced clipboard cut operation for multiple selections

The cut operation now properly handles multiple selected nodes instead of a single schema. Adding the clearMultiSelection() at the end ensures the selection state is reset after cutting, which prevents stale selection state issues.


143-144: Updated function call signature

Correctly updated the call to match the new function signature that no longer requires a schema parameter.

@chilingling chilingling merged commit 24b2f69 into opentiny:develop Mar 13, 2025
1 check passed
1degrees pushed a commit to 1degrees/tiny-engine that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
…nodes (opentiny#1201)

1. 多选节点进行点击回退剩余一个元素时,框选效果异常
2. 快捷键剪切失效
1degrees pushed a commit to 1degrees/tiny-engine that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2025
…nodes (opentiny#1201)

1. 多选节点进行点击回退剩余一个元素时,框选效果异常
2. 快捷键剪切失效
@SonyLeo SonyLeo deleted the fix/multi-cancel branch March 23, 2025 12:02
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2025
14 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants