Destructor without implementation targets incorrect function

[Southclaws]

Is this a BUG REPORT, FEATURE REQUEST or QUESTION?:

• Bug Report
• Feature Request
• Question

What happened:

So I was messing with destructors for my pawn-errors package, eventually didn't end up using them so I removed the implementation for operator~(Error:e[], s) however I forgot that I left the forward operator~(Error:e, s); in the source file, this resulted in some very odd behaviour: when variables left scope, a seemingly random function was called with garbage data as parameters.

What you expected to happen:

I would have expected the same as if you omit any implementation, you get an error message saying "function f(x) is not implemented" however that doesn't seem to apply to operator~.

How to reproduce it (as minimally and precisely as possible):

#include <a_samp>


forward operator~(Error:right[], size);

stock Error:Error(a, what[]) {
    printf("Error called with %d '%s'", a, what);
    return Error:a;
}

main() {
    new Error:e = Error(1, "hi");
}

Side note: if you remove the assignment in main so it's just a declaration of Error:e then the server crashes once it reaches the end of main() with Stack/heap collision: insufficient stack size.

Anything else we need to know?:

I've not tried this with much other code, I did try it without the a parameter in the above repro but it still crashed. It's very strange because the signatures do not match at all, not by tag and not by parameter types.

Environment:

• Operating System: Windows, not tested others
• Compiler version: 3.10.7
• How are you invoking the compiler? sampctl and command line, standard arguments