Skip to content

Transverse field in Amin et al. #35

@apozas

Description

@apozas

When reading this week's quantum paper, I came across something I do not quite understand. In Eq. (16) they define their truly quantum Boltzmann machine Hamiltonian, which has home transverse field, and then they argue that there is one term in the derivative of the error function Eq. (18) that cannot be estimated using sampling. My question is then: does this mean that this QBM would not suppose any improvement over a QBM without the transverse field? It seems like with exact diagonalization they get improvements, so would this be more like some kind of experimental limitation?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions