-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
Transverse field in Amin et al. #35
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Description
When reading this week's quantum paper, I came across something I do not quite understand. In Eq. (16) they define their truly quantum Boltzmann machine Hamiltonian, which has home transverse field, and then they argue that there is one term in the derivative of the error function Eq. (18) that cannot be estimated using sampling. My question is then: does this mean that this QBM would not suppose any improvement over a QBM without the transverse field? It seems like with exact diagonalization they get improvements, so would this be more like some kind of experimental limitation?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels