Skip to content

Improve support for WebFlux RouterFunction #4

@neiser

Description

@neiser

Open points:

  • The RouterFunctionAnalysis does not handle nesting of router functions, also the integration test App27 only tests very simple router function definitions.

  • The competition library springdoc-open-api has the idea of providing some helper predicates to support router functions better. A first attempt has been NamedHeaderPredicate in this library. Investigate this option closer.

  • Improve support for Content-Type and Accept header based content negotiation as we do for WebMVC handler methods

  • Improve finding the response code of a router function, see RouterFunctionHandlerMethodMapper.ResponseMapper

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions