Skip to content

feat: Add peer review of the LLM tutorial#2

Draft
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
add-peer-review-6362866298205753356
Draft

feat: Add peer review of the LLM tutorial#2
google-labs-jules[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
add-peer-review-6362866298205753356

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown

This commit introduces a comprehensive peer review of the project. The review is in a new file, PEER_REVIEW.md, and covers the project's structure, code, and educational approach, offering constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 6362866298205753356 started by @rahuldass19

This commit introduces a comprehensive peer review of the project. The review is in a new file, PEER_REVIEW.md, and covers the project's structure, code, and educational approach, offering constructive feedback and suggestions for improvement.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants