[Data] - Groupby benchmark - sort shuffle pull based#57014
Merged
aslonnie merged 3 commits intoray-project:masterfrom Sep 30, 2025
Merged
[Data] - Groupby benchmark - sort shuffle pull based#57014aslonnie merged 3 commits intoray-project:masterfrom
aslonnie merged 3 commits intoray-project:masterfrom
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com>
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the groupby benchmark to conditionally set override_num_blocks for the SORT_SHUFFLE_PULL_BASED strategy. My review focuses on improving the maintainability of this change by addressing a magic number. I've suggested replacing the hardcoded value with a named constant for better readability and easier modification in the future.
![cursor[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1210556?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
goutamvenkat-anyscale
changed the title
goutamvenkat-anyscale
added
go
alexeykudinkin
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
Collaborator
|
read to merge? |
Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com>
Contributor
Author
yes |
dstrodtman
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Douglas Strodtman <douglas@anyscale.com>
joshkodi
pushed a commit
to joshkodi/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Josh Kodi <joshkodi@gmail.com>
justinyeh1995
pushed a commit
to justinyeh1995/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 20, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com>
landscapepainter
pushed a commit
to landscapepainter/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com>
Aydin-ab
pushed a commit
to Aydin-ab/ray-aydin
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Aydin Abiar <aydin@anyscale.com>
Future-Outlier
pushed a commit
to Future-Outlier/ray
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 7, 2025
The release test (aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer. Related issue: DATA-1399 --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V. <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: Future-Outlier <eric901201@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are these changes needed?
The release test (
aggregate_groups_fixed_size_sort_shuffle_pull_based_column02 column14) for pull based sort shuffle was OOMing. To address this, I reduced the number of blocks to 100 in the read layer.Related issue number
DATA-1399
Checks
git commit -s) in this PR.scripts/format.shto lint the changes in this PR.method in Tune, I've added it in
doc/source/tune/api/under thecorresponding
.rstfile.Note
Conditionally set override_num_blocks=100 for read_parquet when using SORT_SHUFFLE_PULL_BASED in the groupby benchmark.
release/nightly_tests/dataset/groupby_benchmark.py:shuffle_strategyisSORT_SHUFFLE_PULL_BASED, callray.data.read_parquet(..., override_num_blocks=100); otherwise leave unset.groupby(args.group_by)flow unchanged.Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit e567de5. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.