Expose manual stop method in KafkaReceiver#380
Open
cjlee38 wants to merge 4 commits intoreactor:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
Author
|
Hello, It has been quite some time since I submitted this PR, and I haven't received any response yet. I was wondering if support for reactor-kafka has ended, or if there might be another reason for the delay? I don't mean to rush, but I'm leaving this message because it has been a considerable amount of time without any reply. Thank you. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
KafkaReceiver currently is not possible to close safely. An example is below:
dispose()method would be a way, but it might lead to unexpected result because of cancellation leading processed records not to be committed. I think This PR is discussed at #247, and also helps to address #378 indirectly.(People can customize KafkaReceiver's lifecycle after stopping followed bydisposable.isDisposed()I've considered several situations related to thread-safety or something, but might miss I didn't expect. Any further suggestions would be appreciated.