Conversation
Member
|
Seems bad that CodSpeed doesn't detect an improvement here? |
Member
Author
|
Yeah unfortunately it doesn't measure time in syscalls. Though I'd really expect the large allocation for the |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is probably not a serious proposition (converting valid filesystem alterations into memory safety issues isn't great) but acts as a measurement that upki is performance-sensitive in this path.
I have some ideas about how to improve this in a more robust way that need a bit of investigation/measurement.