Skip to content

Fix references to "lo" instead of "ro"#713

Merged
samber merged 2 commits intosamber:masterfrom
pgr0ss:fix-references-to-ro
Oct 13, 2025
Merged

Fix references to "lo" instead of "ro"#713
samber merged 2 commits intosamber:masterfrom
pgr0ss:fix-references-to-ro

Conversation

@pgr0ss
Copy link
Contributor

@pgr0ss pgr0ss commented Oct 13, 2025

I noticed the docs site referenced samber/ro instead of samber/lo in a few places, so I updated the links. However, I wasn't sure about the llms.txt change. Is there a different project we should be linked to?

@samber
Copy link
Owner

samber commented Oct 13, 2025

Oooops, thanks for the report !

I reverted your change on llms.txt, since the project will be published tomorrow. ;)

I created both documentation websites simultaneously (lo+ro).

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.50%. Comparing base (bc73869) to head (d14ff6f).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #713   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.50%   94.50%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        3437     3437           
=======================================
  Hits         3248     3248           
  Misses        175      175           
  Partials       14       14           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@samber samber merged commit d505c18 into samber:master Oct 13, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@pgr0ss pgr0ss deleted the fix-references-to-ro branch October 13, 2025 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants