Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @murfffi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the driver registration mechanism to provide more control over the list of current drivers, which is particularly useful for testing and specific driver management scenarios. It also addresses a subtle bug where only the primary alias of a driver scheme was unregistered, ensuring that all aliases are now properly handled. These changes improve the robustness and maintainability of the driver management code. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a panic that occurred when handling database driver names with two or fewer characters. The fix, which involves iterating over aliases instead of assuming at least one exists, is correct and robust. The refactoring of RegisterNewDrivers into a new RegisterCurrentDrivers function is a great improvement for testability, as demonstrated by the new unit test. I've added one suggestion to further improve the test coverage for the new function.
| func TestRegisterCurrentDrivers(t *testing.T) { | ||
| t.Run("short name", func(t *testing.T) { | ||
| newDrivers := gen.RegisterCurrentDrivers(nil, []string{"d1"}) | ||
| require.Equal(t, []string{"d1"}, newDrivers) | ||
| }) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new test TestRegisterCurrentDrivers is great for covering the short driver name case that this PR fixes. To make the tests for the newly exported RegisterCurrentDrivers function more comprehensive, consider adding a few more sub-tests to cover other scenarios:
- A driver that already exists in the
existingslice (should result in no new drivers). - A driver with a long name that will generate an alias.
- A mix of new, existing, short, and long driver names.
This would increase confidence in the refactored logic and prevent future regressions.
No description provided.