Fix na interpretation

[fhausmann]

Reference Issues/PRs

#575

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

This adds a check for NaN values for all interpretation values, reporting None instead of good values explicitly.

Any other comments?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.41%. Comparing base (66d75bb) to head (272bd5a).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #627      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   99.41%   99.41%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        3351     3380      +29     
  Branches      446      460      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         3331     3360      +29     
  Misses         14       14              
  Partials        6        6              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sadrasabouri]

LGTM, thank you @fhausmann

[sepandhaghighi]

🔥