Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @hnyls2002, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly refactors the scheduling and execution pipeline to enhance performance through more effective overlap of CPU and GPU operations. It introduces a novel "future indices" concept and leverages CUDA streams to enable asynchronous processing, allowing for delayed sampling and more granular control over when and how batch results are processed. These changes aim to reduce idle times and improve the overall throughput of the system, especially in scenarios involving complex generation constraints like grammars. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a FutureIndices dataclass to encapsulate the logic for handling future token indices in overlap scheduling. This is a good refactoring that improves code clarity by replacing primitive types with a dedicated object. The changes primarily affect overlap_utils.py and scheduler.py. I've identified a critical issue in the implementation of store_to_map that would cause incorrect token resolution. The rest of the changes look good.
a40d8ea to
7782a36
Compare
df65001 to
c6b1b1f
Compare
A new abstraction:
FutureIndices, current implementation uses a hacky way to process the future indices, i.e., storing them in theinput_idsofScheduleBatchand using negative numbers to identify which ones are futures.FutureIndicesshould always be the only output of the forward stream.