Skip to content

feat(tianmu): support unsigned load export issue1329#1334

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 7 commits intostoneatom:stonedb-5.7-devfrom
hustjieke:feat_support_unsigned_load_export_issue1329
Mar 6, 2023
Merged

feat(tianmu): support unsigned load export issue1329#1334
mergify[bot] merged 7 commits intostoneatom:stonedb-5.7-devfrom
hustjieke:feat_support_unsigned_load_export_issue1329

Conversation

@hustjieke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hustjieke hustjieke commented Feb 28, 2023

Summary about this PR

Issue Number: close #1329

Tests Check List

  • Unit test
  • Integration test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No code

Changelog

  • New Feature
  • Bug Fix
  • Performance Improvement
  • Build/Testing/CI/CD
  • Documentation
  • Not for changelog (changelog entry is not required)

Documentation

  • Affects user behaviors
  • Contains syntax changes
  • Contains variable changes
  • Contains experimental features

[summary]
1. expand unsigned boundary from signed boundary to max valued.
2. code cover create/insert(delayed/no delayed mode)/update/delete/select.
3. functions and operators(agg and math calculation)

refs: stoneatom#1266
related issue: stoneatom#1151
[summary]
1. add support in load/export module
2. fix format with clint
@hustjieke hustjieke changed the title Feat support unsigned load export issue1329 feat(tianmu): support unsigned load export issue1329 Feb 28, 2023
@mergify mergify bot added the PR-feature feature for pull request label Feb 28, 2023
@hustjieke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

image

The old commits with new just merge into 5.7-dev branch directly. The branch `stonedb/feat_support_unsigned_data_types` will be deleted.

@hustjieke hustjieke requested review from RingsC and wisehead February 28, 2023 03:49
@hustjieke hustjieke force-pushed the feat_support_unsigned_load_export_issue1329 branch from c1d3d39 to ab66ecf Compare February 28, 2023 05:55
@mergify
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Thanks for the contribution!
I have applied any labels matching special text in your PR Changelog.

Please review the labels and make any necessary changes.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 73.50% and project coverage change: +0.01 🎉

Comparison is base (4105e58) 43.12% compared to head (ab66ecf) 43.14%.

❗ Current head ab66ecf differs from pull request most recent head 7fc48b8. Consider uploading reports for the commit 7fc48b8 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           stonedb-5.7-dev    #1334      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            43.12%   43.14%   +0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                 1830     1830              
  Lines               396392   396441      +49     
===================================================
+ Hits                170955   171031      +76     
+ Misses              225437   225410      -27     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
storage/tianmu/core/data_type.h 63.63% <ø> (ø)
storage/tianmu/core/engine.cpp 54.56% <0.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️
storage/tianmu/core/engine.h 30.43% <ø> (ø)
storage/tianmu/core/temp_table.cpp 71.71% <0.00%> (ø)
storage/tianmu/handler/ha_tianmu.cpp 55.85% <40.90%> (-0.19%) ⬇️
storage/tianmu/core/column_type.h 64.70% <50.00%> (ø)
storage/tianmu/core/tianmu_attr_typeinfo.h 78.12% <50.00%> (-1.88%) ⬇️
storage/tianmu/common/common_definitions.cpp 58.46% <52.00%> (+22.39%) ⬆️
storage/tianmu/core/engine_results.cpp 85.53% <90.90%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
storage/tianmu/core/column_type.cpp 96.66% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
... and 58 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@wisehead wisehead requested a review from duanfuxiang0 March 1, 2023 01:32
@hustjieke hustjieke marked this pull request as ready for review March 2, 2023 02:48
@hustjieke
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

image

The old commits with new just merge into 5.7-dev branch directly. The branch stonedb/feat_support_unsigned_data_types will be deleted.

cc @RingsC @duanfuxiang0
{lease take a review, thks!

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@duanfuxiang0 duanfuxiang0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 43fcede into stoneatom:stonedb-5.7-dev Mar 6, 2023
@Nliver Nliver added this to the StoneDB_5.7_v1.0.3 milestone Apr 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

PR-feature feature for pull request

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

feat: impl loader, exporter for unsigned [tinyint~int]

4 participants