Revert "assert: ObjectsAreEqual: use time.Equal for time.Time type"

[brackendawson]

Summary

This reverts commit 34763e0.

time.Time.Equal only tests that the two instances refer to the same instant, but time.Time also carries zone information, so this caused two non-equal instances to be considered equal.

Changes

Revert the change which cases assert.Equal to consider time.Time objects with different zones equal.

Motivation

• We can't assume the user doesn't care about the zone information, we should support testing for state first.
• This would be a breaking change.
• WithinDuration already covered the desired case.

Related issues

Fixes #1536

[arjunmahishi]

Code changes LGTM

---

While you are at it, you might as well fix this:

testify/assert/assertions_test.go

Line 123 in 7b3de08

{time.Now, time.Now, false},

I think this was meant to be

	{time.Now(), time.Now(), false},

---

we should support testing for state first

Can you explain this please?

[Antonboom]

offtop: please introduce more obvious API or improve documentation – when people should use assert.Equal, when assert.True(t, t1.Equal(t2), when assert.EqualUTCTime(...) (or similar)

[brackendawson]

While you are at it, you might as well fix this:

testify/assert/assertions_test.go

Line 123 in 7b3de08

{time.Now, time.Now, false},

I think this was meant to be

	{time.Now(), time.Now(), false},

we should support testing for state first

Can you explain this please?

Coincidence, I think. That's saying that functions are not comparable, it just happens that the author chose time.Now. If we did change it to your suggestion then the test would flake if the two calls were made in the same nanosecond which seems likely.

[brackendawson]

offtop: please introduce more obvious API or improve documentation – when people should use assert.Equal, when assert.True(t, t1.Equal(t2), when assert.EqualUTCTime(...) (or similar)

Thanks, I think #1078 might be the best approach here? Make the failure easier to understand, rather than clutter the Equal doc with information about something you may not be trying to do.

Also for nested time.Time objects something along the lines of #843 might be a good approach?