feat(oas31/style): array items label to schema name (#10794)

[adrianodpdiaz]

Description

In the OAS 3.1 model viewer, when a schema has an array property whose items points to a $ref, the label for the items entry was hardcoded to Items regardless of the referenced schema name. This change makes it display the actual referenced schema name (e.g. User) instead, bringing it in line with the OAS 3.0 UI.

Motivation and Context

#10794

How Has This Been Tested?

• Added unit tests for makeGetTitle covering all relevant cases (test/unit/core/plugins/oas31/json-schema-2020-12-extensions/fn.js)
• Added Cypress E2E tests verifying the label renders the referenced schema name in the browser (test/e2e-cypress/e2e/features/oas31-array-items-label.cy.js)
• Manually verified in the development server (npm run dev) with an OAS 3.1 spec containing array properties with $ref items — the label now shows the schema name instead of Items
• Verified that array properties with anonymous inline items schemas still show Items as fallback

Screenshots:

BEFORE:

AFTER:

Checklist

My PR contains...

• No code changes (src/ is unmodified: changes to documentation, CI, metadata, etc.)
• Dependency changes (any modification to dependencies in package.json)
• Bug fixes (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Improvements (misc. changes to existing features)
• Features (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

My changes...

• are breaking changes to a public API (config options, System API, major UI change, etc).
• are breaking changes to a private API (Redux, component props, utility functions, etc.).
• are breaking changes to a developer API (npm script behavior changes, new dev system dependencies, etc).
• are not breaking changes.

Documentation

• My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.
• My changes require a change to the project documentation.
• If yes to above: I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Automated tests

• My changes can not or do not need to be tested.
• My changes can and should be tested by unit and/or integration tests.
• If yes to above: I have added tests to cover my changes.
• If yes to above: I have taken care to cover edge cases in my tests.
• All new and existing tests passed.

[lukaszzazulak]

@adrianodpdiaz apparently, it is not that simple, see here #9540

see here #9540