Search results

"Numeric literal suffixes live in a parallel lexical scope."

Status: Open.

#32 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· arcanis opened on Sep 29, 2023

Clash with existing with statement

Status: Open.

#31 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· C-Ezra-M opened on Nov 23, 2022

Imaginary Numbers should be built in like Python

Status: Open.

#29 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· 7fe opened on Jan 22, 2021

Supporting polyfilling?

Status: Open.

#28 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· rauschma opened on Sep 3, 2020

Potential alternative: Special lexical declarations for literal syntax

Status: Open.

#26 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· littledan opened on Jan 7, 2020

Passing arguments to numeric template?

Status: Open.

#23 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· miyaokamarina opened on Mar 25, 2019

Overlap with tagged template literals / Number prototype properties

Status: Open.

#16 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· queerviolet opened on May 28, 2018

Operator alternatives

Status: Open.

#15 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· leobalter opened on Mar 27, 2018

What is the benefit of allowing extensions on special numeric literal forms?

Status: Open.

#13 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· rwaldron opened on Mar 26, 2018

Examples citing CSS.px API are incorrect

Status: Open.

#12 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· rwaldron opened on Mar 26, 2018

Would this enable unit conversions?

Status: Open.

#11 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· samuelgoto opened on Mar 20, 2018

Digit separators

Status: Open.

#8 In tc39/proposal-extended-numeric-literals;

· jfbastien opened on Jan 29, 2018