Skip to content

Conversation

@TychoVrahe
Copy link
Contributor

minor bootloader refactoring as preparation for introducing bootloader tests

@TychoVrahe TychoVrahe self-assigned this Dec 2, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🔎 Needs review in Firmware Dec 2, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 2, 2025

en main(all)

model device_test click_test persistence_test
T2T1 test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all)
T3B1 test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all)
T3T1 test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all)
T3W1 test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all) test(all) main(all)

Latest CI run: 19852009639

@TychoVrahe TychoVrahe requested a review from kopecdav December 8, 2025 09:18
}
#define MSG_SEND_ASSIGN_STRING(FIELD, VALUE) \
{ \
msg_send.has_##FIELD = true; \
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nitpick:
In the header file, macros are using the functions/structures which are not included in the same file
Not sure how much is it an issue, just feel bit strange to use the macro somewhere and need to be sure that the correct functions/structure declarations are already available.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 🔎 Needs review to 🏃‍♀️ In progress in Firmware Dec 8, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 🏃‍♀️ In progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants