Ctrl+C no longer kills processes running in parallel with `vite`

[stephenlrandall]

Describe the bug

When using npm-run-all to run package scripts in parallel with the Vite dev process, a Ctrl+C input only kills the Vite process and a second Ctrl+C is needed to kill the remaining scripts. This is a regression from 3.2.5, where a single Ctrl+C killed all parallel running processes. This may be due to the new shortcuts CLI.

Reproduction

https://github.com/stephenlrandall/vite-cli-ctrl-c-bug

Steps to reproduce

Follow the reproduction README.

System Info

System:
    OS: macOS 13.0.1
    CPU: (10) arm64 Apple M1 Max
    Memory: 21.14 GB / 64.00 GB
    Shell: 5.8.1 - /bin/zsh
  Binaries:
    Node: 17.2.0 - /opt/homebrew/bin/node
    npm: 8.19.3 - /opt/homebrew/bin/npm
  Browsers:
    Chrome: 108.0.5359.124
    Safari: 16.1
  npmPackages:
    vite: ^4.0.0 => 4.0.2

Used Package Manager

npm

Logs

No response

Validations

• Follow our Code of Conduct
• Read the Contributing Guidelines.
• Read the docs.
• Check that there isn't already an issue that reports the same bug to avoid creating a duplicate.
• Make sure this is a Vite issue and not a framework-specific issue. For example, if it's a Vue SFC related bug, it should likely be reported to vuejs/core instead.
• Check that this is a concrete bug. For Q&A open a GitHub Discussion or join our Discord Chat Server.
• The provided reproduction is a minimal reproducible example of the bug.

[liangxiwei]

I have the same problem.

[kinfuy]

I guess it's not vite's problem mysticatea/npm-run-all#74

[stephenlrandall]

I guess it's not vite's problem mysticatea/npm-run-all#74

It is a Vite problem. This is a new issue in Vite 4 and was not present in Vite 3.2.5. You can see in the reproduction that other scripts when running in parallel can still be killed with a single Ctrl+C.

[stephenlrandall]

@kinfuy I can trace the issue to this segment of bindShortcuts (authored by @ArnaudBarre):

vite/packages/vite/src/node/shortcuts.ts

Lines 72 to 74 in 3647c78

	if (process.stdin.isTTY) {
	process.stdin.setRawMode(true)
	}

About setRawMode:

When in raw mode, input is always available character-by-character, not including modifiers. Additionally, all special processing of characters by the terminal is disabled, including echoing input characters. Ctrl+C will no longer cause a SIGINT when in this mode.

Commenting this line out causes Ctrl+C to work again, but I presume causes other issues with the CLI. Ideally, Vite would be able to do what it needs to without hijacking the input stream.

[stephenlrandall]

In the absence of any other solutions, an option to disable the shortcuts CLI (preventing the bindShortcuts function from being run in the first place) would also solve this issue.

[kinfuy]

setRawMode It will cause the command line to press ctrl+c and no longer send the termination signal

[kinfuy]

vite/packages/vite/src/node/shortcuts.ts

Lines 45 to 46 in 2c38bae

	// ctrl+c or ctrl+d
	if (input === '\x03' || input === '\x04') {

I see there are codes in the main branch to handle this

[kinfuy]

I guess this is the problem. In the case of an output stream, process. exit () cannot exit

[ArnaudBarre]

Maybe we can rethink how the cli should exit in case of ctrl+c. But currently with the new shortcuts, we are able to cleanly exit the CLI and the 0 exit code is not totally wrong. I think this would be kept as is for the q shortcut.

Multiple others options for you:

• Change your other watch process to be binded with Vite via plugins. This is what I do for tsc watch for example.
• Starts Vite dev server with the JS API. This doesn't enable shortcuts
• Use -r for the npm-run-all command to exit when Vite exit with code 0.

[kinfuy]

I think that ctrl c represents the forced termination by the user. It is normal for the exit code to be 1. The shortcut key provided by vite means to exit normally. At this time, it is obviously impossible to exit normally, so the exit code is 0. It is reasonable to not respond to this operation.

[kinfuy]

If I have to choose one of the three suggestions, I feel it is inappropriate to choose the second and third. First, I have to study it