[selectors-4][editorial] Clarify when multiple scoping roots are provided#13491
Open
[selectors-4][editorial] Clarify when multiple scoping roots are provided#13491
Conversation
Collaborator
Author
This is incorrect: |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
§ 8.4. The Reference Element Pseudo-class:
:scopedefines that it represents one or more scoping roots, and what:scoperepresents when zero or one scoping root is provided, but not when more than one scoping roots are provided. I hope the proposed change is obvious.§ 17.5. Match a Selector Against a Tree defines that it takes one or more scoping roots but later at its step 2, it checks if scoping root were provided, which seems to be an oversight (singular subject, plural conjugation).